|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ratings - True to Form
Would the Ratings followers please explain why NONE of the Top Rated horses won at MV yesterday? I very rarely look at how ratings are going, but decided to for yesterday's races. An untrained monkey could do better, and to think some people take ratings seriously Ho-Diddly-Ho !!!!!
R1 - 7 R2 - LAST R3 - 2 R4 - 4 R5 - 2 @ $1.30 R6 - 6 R7 - 2 R8 - 2, 3 & 5 (3 were Top Rated) R9 - 3 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Just had a look at Rosehill.
It get's worse !! There were 13, yes 13 horses rated @ 100. I guess the Ratings people were so excited that they thought there would be a few dead heats, the odd triple deadheat and so on. 13 Top Rated horses at Rosehill and guess how many saluted ???? N-O-N-E, Diddly Squat, Zero, ZIP, Calbashooka !!!!!!!!!! Gimme a Break |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Barny,
Yesterday was certainly not a good day for the 100 pointers with none saluting in Melb or Syd and only one greeting the judge in Bris & Adel. That's 40 bets for 2 winners ($2.60 & $3.80 at BOB) - Very ugly! As the say in the classics "one swallow does not make a summer". Since 7th July I have been able to "etch" out a 80% POT by having 5 selection rules. Yesterday I only ended up with one qualifier which ran unplaced. Currently my strike rate is 29.4% over the 4 states, all of which are showing profits. This is only one of the methods I run and October has not been kind and has shown a minor loss. A sign of more chances in races as better class horses are plentiful? It will be interesting to see where this method takes me over the next few months. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Now that's impressive, well done ! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Depends on WHO rated them.?
UNITAB is NOT the only Rating service in Australia. Last edited by darkydog2002 : 28th October 2012 at 02:58 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I would have thought that they'd all go from a similar blue print.
OK, darkydog2002, Melbourne and Sydney, how did your Rating Service go yesterday ?? Your bet of the day ran last, so I'm assuming that was Top Rated. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
None, Naught, Nought, Zilch, Nil. sweet f / a, nowt, nil, non, emptiness annihilation, aught, bagatelle, blank, cipher, crumb, diddly, duck egg, extinction, fly speck, goose egg, insignificancy, naught, nihility, nix, no thing, nobody, nonbeing, nonentity, nonexistence, not anything, nothingness, nought, nullity, obliteration, oblivion, scratch, shutout, trifle, void, wind, zero, zilch, zip, zippo, zot insignificancy, naught, nil, nobody, nonentity, nought, nullity, squat, Zilch, Nada, Nowt, Nil, Luv, Nul, Null, Nichts, Niente, Sifir, ************
Last edited by Barny : 28th October 2012 at 02:45 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
See - 27 October Cox Plate GP 1
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OOPS.Sorry Barny but the thread was started by "Myhatmycoat"
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have been using ratings for around 25 years. If during that time I backed my top rated horse only, I would have been broke years ago.
From my point of view I use ratings to sort out the main chances in the race, and if I consider it a betting race then the market will dictate if I bet or not. It is extremely difficult to profit long term from backing only 1 horse per race, unless you have a lot of patience. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|