#41
|
|||
|
|||
Privateer's Pareto thread had Pre-Post odds of $3.50 to $11.00 as the number one criteria in a system that was based around recurring stats in good fields.
DTM |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
MY assumption is that in both venues the rating services were the same, raising the issue of track speciality. This is a crucial element in ratings. It is one thing to be good at one state. It is extremely hard to be good at more than one state. SP is consistent with fav stats. There seems to be an arguement to check the results dutching the top four. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
...W2 W4 W1 POT PP 25 38 0 (39) OP 50 63 38 (26) SP 63 63 38 (26) RS1 50 88 25 35 RS2 50 75 50 26 RS3 38 75 13 56 RS4 38 75 25 24 RS5 63 75 25 24 RS6 75 75 63 26 Where POT = % return dutching top 4 via BF SP. Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
RANDWICK
......POT PP (7) OP (7) SP (7) RS1 (7) RS2 28 RS3 (34) RS4 66 RS5 53 RS6 (37) LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Suitable arguement to monitor. Rather than get one overall, find a consistent rating for each state.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|