[QUOTE=If you layed firming first and / or second favourites (the best profit), you made 4.08% POT.

Such slim margins explain the long runs of bad results, the need for bet size to be a very low percentage of overall bank, and why bookies are raking it in on drifters given their market percentages and banning any savvy punters who get on firmers early doors.[/QUOTE]


Something not gelling here CP, a juxtaposition perhaps? Your survey says it's profitable to LAY firming favourites....so anyone Backing firming favourites would be losing during this month and Backing drifting favourites presumably doing better,...... right?

BUT then you say the Bookies are raking it in on drifters? Wouldn't it be the reverse? Why would they ban punters who Back firmers, as they, the Backers, lose?

I'm sure you'll clear it up. Despite that thanks for the survey. I call 4% an excellent return. 4% is better than bank interest, but given you're probably only been exposed to say 12 x liability drawdown it'd be +$751 return on $360 ever risked, and because you're continually recycling your money, the return is turbocharged.

What was the max drawdown, if I might ask? I presume it was for only Gallops and no Dogs?