Good point Paul. Some of us may prefer a world of unknowns to challenge and solve, especially those of us who are systems/process orientated. The challenge and joy being in cracking a problem by examining the questions it ponders, rather than having the answers presented to us or dialing them up at will, without the 'discovery element' attached to the experience.

The preference for a deductive top-down approach versus an inductive alternative? i.e. a rubix cube of opportunities and possibilities to play with versus a transparent version with elaborate wiring which has already been labelled for the eye to see, and buttons to press which create known outcomes.

I might be wrong.. the R2W box of tricks may do both, and therefore become attractive to a wider range of 'pro punters' with different headsets strapped on. Those who prefer to start with certainty AND those who prefer to tackle what is unknown?

What I do know is this.. I need another coffee!


Cheers LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB