|
Morning Michal, consensus between variables/indicators being the ongoing theme here but hard to ascertain the materiality of this unless we see the full sample as well, I guess? e.g. impact values or a similar stat
Cheers LG |
Quote:
Hi LG The consensus between variables/indicators is not intended to be, nor is the ongoing theme here. The ongoing theme from our perspective is the publication and transparency of our results that underpin our daily performance, something that is uncommon amongst our competition. Those that understand what Axis has to offer (our clients) are then able to capitalise on the consensus that exists across a number of our ratings and other indicators for their own betting purposes in any way that they choose. The fact that this is possible is currently being demonstrated in the Favourites thread, which not only outperforms the market favourites but highlights these potential selections well in advance. In a practical application, using these selections to trade, is another way to profit from the unique content and the translation of that data that Axis clients enjoy. The key point here of course is the majority of our data is not able to be accessed by the mainstream betting public and is reserved for the benefit of paying clients. |
11/06/2013
Code:
|
Morning Paul, thanks for your detailed response here and also the major benefits of value behind the opportunity you are presenting here. If I could change one or two words in my original post to better reflect my question, it would be this...
Morning Michal, consensus between variables/indicators being an ongoing theme for me here. Are you able to confirm whether the 4 indicators (as shown on this thread) are included with your lowest subscription level and/or the favorites as per your other thread?? Cheers LG |
Quote:
Hi LG Unfortunately only one of the ratings featured in the variables contained within this post is included in the Classic subscription, that being the Speed Rating. Also included is the Official Handicappers Rating. The other levels of subscription to choose from are Advanced, Advanced plus indicators and Professional. If you wanted to replicate the Profitable Favourites system, you would need the Advanced plus indicators package. The Advanced subscription includes additional ratings and features to the Classic package such as the Intelligence Rating, PkD, RV, Consensus and more. There is an easy product comparison chart located within the Axis page on this site which can be found by clicking the link contained in my signature below. If I can assist with anything else then please let me know. |
12/06/2013
Code:
|
Code:
|
Quote:
LG |
LG.
Perhaps you could consider a Syndicate of punters to share costs. Most of the Intelligent punters would have won the cost of a subscription /or Part thereof anyway just by betting these Free ones. Cheers. |
Quote:
Hi darkydog2002 Great idea save for the fact that we do not allow people to share the costs of a subscription. To do so would infringe out terms and conditions and would not be fair to those clients that pay for individual subscriptions. We have closed accounts previously because of this type of breach. You are absolutely correct though when you say that the profits alone from the free selections would have more than covered the cost of being a client of R2W. In fact when you consider that you could have ongoing access to the system that in fact generates these selections and others, for as little as $6.35 a day, it makes you wonder why anyone who is even remotely serious about their punting does not use a service like ours. |
Totally agree Paul.
Cheers darky |
Quote:
The bulk of our features as far as ratings and form is concerned can be found in the Advanced level which is our 2nd lowest subscription level; including our flagship IR rating! This is certainly far from top of the range, bells and whistles and all. Recent Winning Highlights feature a sample of 4 ratings from a mixture covering the starting level, through to our most unique rating; not just the top and most expensive! Realistic and transparent, that is the way we present EVERYTHING. Our product range scales up, the more you pay the more unique information you get. The Advanced (2nd lowest) version has 6 ratings with which you can form consensus with; additionally there is (soon) the ability to import 5 external ratings to boost the number of your consensus power, and have the ability to fully analyse/test these ratings just as the native Axis ratings. This from a 2nd lowest priced service. A bargain! Definitely not the top, bells and whistles, and very much within the reach of the most conservative punter at just $4.2 per day. If your individual bet size is even just $10, the positive results you could achieve with a product that costs less than half a single bet a day are endless !!!!!! The reason we used the indicators in the Favourites thread is so that we could produce a system that has 3000 selections and makes a profit; a realistic, truthful, long-term and sustainable product. This requires the full strength of our available ratings. I can assure you that there are many, many pockets of profit to be found with just the Advanced version all be it with a smaller number of selection sample. Apologies for the lengthy post |
14/06/2013
Code:
"The Zero" was the winner of Geelong 5, the selected race for 14/06/2013 in the 'Ratings Test & Analysis' thread http://www.propun.com.au/racing_for...ead.php?t=26639 |
15/06/2013
Code:
"Avas Delight" was the winner of MV 5, the selected race for 15/06/2013 in the 'Ratings Test & Analysis' thread http://www.propun.com.au/racing_for...ead.php?t=26639 |
16/06/2013
Code:
"Bishops Castle" was the winner of Bendigo 5, the selected race for 16/06/2013 in the 'Ratings Test & Analysis' thread http://www.propun.com.au/racing_for...ead.php?t=26639 |
17/06/2013
Code:
|
18/06/2013
Code:
|
19/06/2013
Code:
|
20/06/2013
Code:
|
21/06/2013
Code:
|
22/06/2013
Code:
|
23/06/2013
Code:
|
25/06/2013
Code:
|
26/06/2013
Code:
|
27/06/2013
Code:
|
28/06/2013
Code:
|
29/06/2013
Code:
|
30/06/2013
Code:
|
End of Month Summary June
This the end of month summary for the Intelligence Rating (IR) for June 2013 for all TAB Australian Races
Races covered = 1337 Top Pick Strike Rate = 26.1% Top 3 Strike Rate = 56.8% This is the accumulative results for period (5/3/2010 - 30/06/2013) Races covered = 52,100+ Top Pick Strike Rate = 26.9% Top 3 Strike Rate = 58.4% |
Evening Michal.
There doesn't appear to be a great deal of variance between the short run and long term results, as with your favorites thread. Have you cut and diced further to determine the best returns for least outlay and is this info readily available with 'the kit', or am I delving to close to the bone here? Cheers LG |
Hi LG,
Thanks for those comments. You are right, the divergence isn't great which is good to see. Knowing that the method that produces these selections has performed similar not just the last 3.5 years but over further 2 years back before that (we cant release that as we don't have all the required info) leaves me confident that the performance point has been found and wont change. The 'kit' doesn't come with any systems. Using our Selection Finder/ Analyser is easy and intuitive. Once you come up with an idea for a system and test it, the analysis tells you instantly what improvements can be found using about 120 different filters. Our Favourite system took me about 30 min to create. There are many ideas for systems everywhere, and providing that it has some logical rules Axis can usually improve it's performance. The great thing is anyone can find out within the 2 week money back guarantee period if there is any value to the program for them. The tests are easy to run and it takes just a few hours to read the manual to get ones head around the whole thing. So far we haven't had anyone actually request money back. Also even our lowest subscription has the ability to analyse ALL the data (ratings, and other proprietary data) so that you could see what benefit there is using them. Of course that applys only to resulted data, so its retrospective, if you want the data on race day then increasing subscription level will allow you to access that data on race day. Still don't know many competitors that even let anyone have a look at their data this way. Finally the Consensus panel creates a completely user defined unique rating, something that is over looked by many users. We are also introducing a new module called My Assessments which allows punters to create their own rating/adjustment to our to give them complete control over what they want. Over the next month we will be adding the ability to import up to 5 outside ratings. These can be from anywhere and these will not only allow users extra scope in the consensus but it will also allow total testing and analysis ability, just like any of the native Axis ratings. So instead of 13 there is the possibility to have 18 ratings to create systems with to start off with (before any form/race filters) for those that want to go that extra mile. So I would say that there is quite a lot of meat on the bone for clients to create truly unique systems/methods based on our ratings and data that simply isn't found in your local newspaper of free sites. I hope that answers your question, sorry for the extended read |
Makes for great reading. Cheers Michal.
LG |
01/07/2013
Code:
|
02/07/2013
Code:
|
03/07/2013
Code:
|
04/07/2013
Code:
|
05/06/2013
Code:
|
06/07/2013
Code:
|
07/07/2013
Code:
|
08/07/2013
Code:
|
| All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:23 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.